Closed but Not Recovered: Size, Time, and the Limits of Audit Follow-Up in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijist.v4i10.61Keywords:
Audit Recommendations, Local Government, Public Accountability, Recovery of State Losses, Selective ComplianceAbstract
Follow-up of audit recommendations is usually measured by how many recommendations are closed. That measure ignores whether the money at stake is actually recovered. This study separates the two. Data come from the Supreme Audit Board's recommendation follow-up monitoring appendix for local governments, status as of Semester I 2024, covering 518 entities that reconcile on both counts and values. Across the 2018 to 2022 cohorts, local governments closed 72.13 percent of recommendations on average but recovered only 53.1 percent of the 11.34 trillion rupiah at stake. Recovery falls monotonically with the size of the recommendation, from 99.06 percent in the smallest decile to 55.71 percent in the largest, and to 39.65 percent on an aggregate basis. Closure falls by only 9.0 points across the same deciles. With cohort and entity fixed effects, a tenfold larger recommendation portfolio is associated with recovery lower by 18.7 percentage points. Resolution also stalls: closure rises by 5.12 points a year up to age eight and by 0.09 points a year thereafter, leaving 49,639 recommendations issued between 2005 and 2017 still open. The follow-up system settles small and recent matters and leaves large and old ones unresolved.
References
Adriansyah. (2026a). An opinion that does not discriminate: Audit opinion and local financial condition in South Sulawesi, 2020-2022. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Adriansyah. (2026b). What the opinion hides: Audit recommendation follow-up as a discriminating accountability marker in Indonesia. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2018). Indonesian local government's accountability and performance: The isomorphism institutional perspective. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 19(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190187
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2024. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Faisal, M., & Siswantoro, D. (2019). Audit findings, financial performance, and audit opinion of local government: Evidence in Indonesia. In Accounting, auditing, CSR, and the taxation in a changing environment: A study on Indonesia (pp. 255-270). Nova Science Publishers.
Furqan, A. C., Wardhani, R., Martani, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2020). The effect of audit findings and audit recommendation follow-up on the financial report and public service quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(5), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2019-0173
Indriani, D., Tinangon, J. J., & Budiarso, N. S. (2024). The impact of audit findings and follow-up actions on audit recommendations on audit opinions of financial statements with APIP capabilities as a moderating variable. The Contrarian: Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 3(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.159
Istianah, I., Sari, N. P., & Indriani, V. (2024). A systematic review of public sector audits in Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 10(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v10i1.1544
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Nurhidayah, N., Sudarma, M., Djamhuri, A., & Atmini, S. (2024). Audit opinion research: Overview and research agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2301134. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301134
Pamungkas, B., Ibtida, R., & Avrian, C. (2018). Factors influencing audit opinion of the Indonesian municipal governments' financial statements. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1540256. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1540256
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Power, M. (2003). Evaluating the audit explosion. Law & Policy, 25(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2003.00147.x
Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE.
Setiyanto, A., Widiarta, F., Fauz, A., Asysyipa, A., Perdana, I., & Aji, S. G. (2026). Audit follow-up and public service quality: The role of financial management in East Java. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 12(1), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v12i1.2682
