From Contextual Dimension to Integrative Mechanism: Conceptual Reconstruction of Local Wisdom and the Transferability of a Local Wisdom-Based P4gn Policy Implementation Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijist.v4i7.32Keywords:
Keywords: local wisdom, integrative factors, conceptual reconstruction, model transferability, policy replicationAbstract
While local knowledge is considered a contextual variable alongside other variables, most policy implementation literature views it as a supporting factor rather than a driving factor. This article analyzes the conceptual reconstruction process of local wisdom from its initial position as one of the six dimensions of the implementation of the Prevention and Eradication of Narcotics Abuse and Illegal Narcotics Trafficking (P4GN) policy in Lampung Province to its current position as a component that connects all other dimensions. This change was driven by reflection on empirical patterns that emerged repeatedly during the analysis phase within and across cases across the four research areas. These patterns include the values of deliberation and kinship that drive cooperation between actors in Way Kanan Regency, reciprocal cooperation that drives community participation in North Lampung Regency, traditional figures upholding the legitimacy of liaison actors in Tulang Bawang Regency, and In this paper, the results indicate the possibility of implementing a local wisdom-based policy implementation model and its five requirements. The argument states that the conceptual structure of inter-dimensional interactions, which can be adapted to local institutional, social, and cultural characteristics, can be used elsewhere, even though the implementation configuration is different from that in Lampung Province.
References
REFERENCES
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Edwards, G. C., III. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2022). Implementing Public Policy (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying Public Policy: Principles and Processes (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman and Company.
O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Suranto, S., & Darumurti, A. (2024). Local wisdom-based policy innovation in Indonesia during 2018–2021. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i1.16920
Wirata, G., Nurfadilah, N., & colleagues. (2025). Integrating traditional knowledge and local wisdom into public policy for addressing social and ecological crises: A systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 10(1).
Yulianingrum, A. V., Nur, I. T., Prasetyo, B., Aidil, A., Haya, D. A. F., & Paturu, R. O. (2023). Participatory local regulations based on local wisdom: Study of local regulation formation policy of Kutai Kartanegara Regency. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(3), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.214






